Sth. has become an important issue recently.
×î½ü£¬Ä³ÊÂÒѾ³ÉΪһ¸öÖØÒªÎÊÌâÁË
The ethical judgments of the Supreme Court justices have become an important issue recently. ¶ÔÁª°î×î¸ß·¨Ôº·¨¹ÙµÄµÀµÂÆÀÅÐÒѾ³ÉΪ×î½üµÄÒ»¸öÖØÒªÎÊÌâ¡£
Sb. acted in ways that
weaken sth¡¯s reputation for being adj.
ijÈ˵ÄÐÐΪÏ÷ÈõµÄijÎÔõÑù£©µÄÃûÉù
Justices acted in ways that weaken the court¡¯s reputation for being independent and impartial. ·¨¹ÙµÄÐÐΪÏ÷ÈõÁË·¨Ôº¶ÀÁ¢¹«ÕýµÄÃûÉù
Part of the problem
is that sb. is not bound by sth.
²¿·ÖÎÊÌ⣨ÔÒò£©ÔÚÓÚijЩÈ˲»ÊÜ¡µÄÔ¼Êø
Part of the problem is that the justices are not bound by an ethics code. ²¿·ÖÔÒòÔÚÓÚ·¨¹Ù²¢²»Êܵ½µÄ¹æ·¶µÄÔ¼Êø
Sb. should make itself
subject to the code of conduct that applies to somebody else.
ijÈËÓ¦¸Ã´ÓÊôÓÚ£¨×ñÊØ£©Í¬ÑùÊÊÓÃÓÚÆäËûÈ˵ÄÐÐΪ׼Ôò
The court should make itself subject to the code of conduct that applies to the rest of the federal judiciary.
·¨ÔºÓ¦¸Ã×ñÊØÊÊÓÃÓÚÆäËûÁª°î˾·¨ÏµÍ³µÄÐÐΪ׼Ôò
1
This and other similar cases raise the question of whether
there is still a line between A and B.
ÕâһʼþºÍÆäËûÀàËÆµÄÇé¿öÌá³öÁËÒ»¸öÖÊÒÉ£¬ ÄǾÍÊÇÔÚAºÍBÖ®¼äÊÇ·ñ»¹´æÔÚ½çÏÞ
This and other similar cases raise the question of
whether there is still a line between the court and politics.
ÕâһʼþºÍÆäËûÀàËÆµÄÇé¿öÌá³öÁËÒ»¸öÖÊÒÉ£¬ÄǾÍÔÚ·¨ÔººÍÕþÖÎÖ®¼äÊÇ·ñ»¹´æÔÚ½çÏÞ
Sb. must address doubts about A
by making themselves accountable to B.
ijÈ˱ØÐë¶ÔB¸ºÔð£¨×ñÊØB£©£¬ ÒÔ´ËÀ´½â¾öÈËÃǶÔAµÄÖÊÒÉ
The justices must address doubts about the court¡¯s legitimacy by making themselves accountable to the code of conduct.
·¨¹ÙÃDZØÐë¶ÔÐÐΪ׼Ôò¸ºÔð£¨×ñÊØÐÐΪ׼Ôò£©£¬ÒÔ´ËÀ´½â¾ö¹ØÓÚ·¨Ôº¹«ÕýÐÔµÄÖÊÒÉ
Come on ¨CEverybody¡¯s doing it. That whispered message, half invitation and half forcing, is what most of us think of when we hear the words peer pressure.
A is what most of us think of when we hear the words B.
µ±ÎÒÃÇÌýµ½BÕâ¸ö´ÊµÄʱºò£¬ÎÒÃÇ´ó¶àÊýÈËÏëµ½µÄÊÇA
Come on ¨CEverybody¡¯s doing it. That whispered message, half invitation and half forcing, is what most of us think of when we hear the words peer pressure.
µ±ÎÒÃÇÌýµ½¡°Í¬ÁäÈËѹÁ¦¡±Õâ¸ö´ÊÓïµÄʱºò£¬ÎÒÃÇ´ó¶àÊýÈËÏëµ½µÄÊÇ´øÓÐÒ»°ëÑûÇëÐÔÖÊ£¬Ò»°ëÇ¿ÆÈÐÔÖʵÄÀàËÆÇÄÇÄ»°°ãµÄÐÅÏ¢¡ª¡ª¡°À´Â´ó¼Ò¶¼Õâô×ö¡±¡£
2
A usually leads to no good. But sb. contends that
A can also be a positive force.
A ͨ³£»áÔì³É²»ºÃµÄÊÂÇé¡£
µ«ÊÇijÈËÈÏΪAÒ²¿ÉÒÔ³ÉΪһÖÖ»ý¼«µÄÁ¦Á¿
It usually leads to no good-drinking, drugs and casual sex. But in her new book Join the Club, Tina Rosenberg contends that peer pressure can also be a positive force.
Õ⣨ͬÁäÈËѹÁ¦£©Í¨³£»áµ¼Ö²»ºÃµÄÊÂÇ顪¡ªÖîÈçÐï¾Æ¡¢à¾Ò©ºÍÀĽ»¡£µ«ÊÇTina RosenbergÔÚËýµÄÐÂÊé¡¶¼ÓÈë¾ãÀÖ²¿¡·ÖÐÈÏΪ£¬Í¬ÁäÈËѹÁ¦Ò²¿ÉÒÔ³ÉΪһÖÖ»ý¼«µÄÁ¦Á¿¡£
Sb. use the power of A
to help individuals improve their lives and possibly the word.
ijÈËÔËÓÃAµÄÁ¦Á¿À´°ïÖúÈËÃǸÄÉÆËûÃǵÄÉú»î£¬ ÉõÖÁÊǸÄÉÆÕâ¸öÊÀ½ç
Organizations and officials use the power of group dynamics to help individuals improve their lives and possibly the word.
ºÜ¶à»ú¹¹ºÍ¹ÙÔ±ÔËÓÃȺÌ嶯Á¦Ñ§µÄÁ¦Á¿À´°ïÖú¸öÈ˸ÄÉÆÉú»î£¬ÉõÖÁÊǸÄÉÆÊÀ½ç
Sb ,²åÈëÓï, offers a host of example of A in action.
£¨ÔõôÑùµÄ£©Ä³ÈËÌṩÁË´óÁ¿µÄÔÚÆð×÷ÓõÄAµÄÀý×Ó
Rosenberg, the recipient of a Pulitzer Prize, offers a host of example of the social cure in action. ÆÕÀû²ß½±»ñµÃÕßRosenbergÌṩÁË´óÁ¿µÄÕýÔÚÆð×÷ÓõÄÉç»áÖÎÁƵÄÀý×Ó
3
A state-sponsored A program sets out to make B uncool.
Ò»¸öÓÉÖÝÕþ¸®×ÊÖúµÄ¹ØÓÚAµÄ»î¶¯¼Æ»® ÊÔͼʹB±äµÃ²»ÊÜ»¶Ó
A state-sponsored antismoking program called Rage Against the Haze sets out to make cigarettes uncool.
Ò»¸öÓÉÖÝÕþ¸®×ÊÖúµÄ³ÆÎª¡°¶ÔÑá¶ñµÄ·ßÅ¡±µÄ·´ÎüÑÌÔ˶¯£¬ ÊÔͼʹÎüṈ̃äµÃ²»ÔÙ¿á
Sb¡¯s critique of the lameness of A is spot-on.
ijÈ˶ÔAµÄ²»×ãÖ®´¦µÄÆÀÂÛÊǺܵ½Î»µÄ
Her critique of the lameness of many pubic-health campaigns is spot-on. Ëý¶ÔÓÚÐí¶à¹«¹²½¡¿µÔ˶¯µÄ²»×ãÖ®´¦µÄÆÀÂÛÊǺܵ½Î»µÄ
Sb demonstrate
a seriously flawed understanding of A.
ijÈËÏÔʾ³ö¶ÔAµÄÑÏÖØ²»×ãµÄÀí½â
They demonstrate a seriously flawed understanding of psychology. ËûÃÇÏÔʾ³ö¶ÔÐÄÀíѧµÄÑÏÖØ²»×ãµÄÀí½â
Sb. argues convincingly that A ought to take a page from B, so skilled at applying C.
ijÈËÈ·ÐŵØÈÏΪ£¬AÓ¦¸Ãѧϰ·Ç³£ÉÆÓÚÓ¦ÓÃCµÄB/
Rosenberg argues convincingly that public-health advocates ought to take a page from advertisers, so skilled at applying peer pressure.
4