¸ß¿¼Ó¢Óï¶þÂÖ¸´Ï°¿¼Ç°Èý¸öÔÂרÌâÒ»ÔĶÁÀí½âϸ×öÄ£ÄâÊÔÌâ,ÌâÐÍ·ÖÀàÍ»ÆÆ(Ê®¶þ)ÎÄÕ½ṹ֮ƪÕ½ṹÌâ ÏÂÔØ±¾ÎÄ

£¨È«¹úͨÓã©2017°æ¸ß¿¼Ó¢Óï¶þÂÖ¸´Ï°¿¼Ç°Èý¸öÔÂרÌâÒ»ÔĶÁÀí½âϸ×öÄ£ÄâÊÔÌ⣬ÌâÐÍ·ÖÀà

Í»ÆÆ£¨Ê®¶þ£©ÎÄÕ½ṹ֮ƪÕ½ṹÌâ

ÎÄÕ½ṹ֮ƪÕ½ṹÌâ

A

The term ¡°helicopter parents¡± refers to ¡°a style of parents who are over focused on their children¡±£®

Helicopter parents are always making a big push to provide children with every opportunity to succeed£¬from baby steps at age 1£¬homework at age 8£¬college application at age 18£¬employment issues at age 25 to family problems at age 30,40 or even older.They constantly shadow the child£¬always directing his behavior£¬allowing him zero alone time.

Helicopter parenting can develop for a number of reasons.Worries about the economy£¬the job market£¬and the world in general can push parents toward taking more control over their child¡¯s life in an attempt to protect them.Adults who felt unloved or ignored as children can overcompensate their own children.When parents see other overinvolved parents£¬it can cause a similar response.They feel that if they don¡¯t involve themselves in their children¡¯s lives£¬they are bad parents.

The main problem with helicopter parenting is that it can backfire.To give an example£¬the house where Mary lived with roommates was broken into and things were stolen.Mary called the landlord(·¿¶«) to install an alarm system£¬but before she could finish the negotiations(ЭÉÌ)£¬her mother rushed in and demanded action.¡°I felt like my mother ruined my communication with our landlord.We could have gotten it done ourselves.She was well intended but only made me feel annoyed and defeated£¬¡± says Mary.

Obviously£¬overparenting is motivated with the idea of doing good things but it does the exact opposite.In the long run parents are actually damaging their child¡¯s basic skills to deal with matters independently.It makes the child feel lacking in confidence£¬less competent in dealing with the stresses of life on their own.They¡¯re winning the battle£¬but actually losing the war.

ÓïÆª½â¶Á ±¾ÎÄΪ˵Ã÷ÎÄ¡£Ö÷Òª½éÉÜÁË¡°Ö±Éý»úʽ¸¸Ä¸¡±µÄ¶¨Ò壬²úÉú¡°Ö±Éý»úʽ¸¸Ä¸¡±µÄÔ­Òò¼°Î£º¦¡£ 1£®What¡¯s the purpose of helicopter parents¡¯ overparenting? A£®To do something good for their children. B£®To make their children not ignored. C£®To help their children find a good job.

1 / 8

£¨È«¹úͨÓã©2017°æ¸ß¿¼Ó¢Óï¶þÂÖ¸´Ï°¿¼Ç°Èý¸öÔÂרÌâÒ»ÔĶÁÀí½âϸ×öÄ£ÄâÊÔÌ⣬ÌâÐÍ·ÖÀà

Í»ÆÆ£¨Ê®¶þ£©ÎÄÕ½ṹ֮ƪÕ½ṹÌâ D£®To get rid of the pressure from other parents. ´ð°¸ A

½âÎö ϸ½ÚÀí½âÌâ¡£¸ù¾Ý×îºóÒ»¶ÎµÚÒ»¾ä¡°Obviously£¬overparenting is motivated with the idea of doing good things...¡±¿ÉÖª¡°Ö±Éý»úʽ¸¸Ä¸¡±¹ý·ÖºÇ»¤º¢×ÓµÄÄ¿µÄÊÇÏë×öһЩÓÐÒæÓÚº¢×ÓÃǵÄÊÂÇ飬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªAÏî¡£ 2£®What can we learn from the passage?

A£®Children who have helicopter parents live a hard life. B£®Helicopter parenting only happens to very young children.

C£®Helicopter parents can protect their children against all problems. D£®Helicopter parents do their children great harm in the long run. ´ð°¸ D

½âÎö ÍÆÀíÅжÏÌâ¡£¸ù¾Ý×îºóÒ»¶Î¿ÉÖª£¬´Ó³¤Ô¶¿´¹ý·ÖºÇ»¤º¢×Ó»á»Ùµôº¢×Ó¶ÀÁ¢´¦ÀíÎÊÌâµÄ»ù±¾¼¼ÇÉ£¬Ê¹º¢×Óȱ·¦×ÔÐÅÐÄ£¬ÔÚ´¦ÀíÉú»îѹÁ¦·½ÃæÈ±·¦¾ºÕùÁ¦¡£Óɴ˿ɼû´Ó³¤Ô¶¿´£¬¡°Ö±Éý»úʽ¸¸Ä¸¡±¶Ôº¢×ÓÓкܴóΣº¦£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªDÏî¡£

3£®What will possibly be discussed in the paragraph that follows? A£®The bad effects of helicopter parenting. B£®How we can avoid being helicopter parents. C£®Different opinions about helicopter parenting. D£®The reasons for the development of helicopter parents. ´ð°¸ B

½âÎö ƪÕ½ṹÌâ¡£ÎÄÕµÚÒ»¡¢¶þ¶Î½éÉÜÁË¡°Ö±Éý»úʽ¸¸Ä¸¡±µÄ¶¨Òå¼°±íÏÖ£¬µÚÈý¶Î½éÉÜÁ˲úÉú¡°Ö±Éý»úʽ¸¸Ä¸¡±µÄÔ­Òò£¬×îºóÁ½¶Î½éÉÜÁË¡°Ö±Éý»úʽ¸¸Ä¸¡±µÄΣº¦¡£ÓÉ´Ë¿ÉÖªÎÄÕÂÏÂÎÄÓ¦¸Ã½éÉÜÈçºÎ±ÜÃâ³ÉΪ¡°Ö±Éý»úʽ¸¸Ä¸¡±£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªBÏî¡£

B

The U£®S.Postal Service(USPS) is losing billions of dollars a year.The government company that delivers ¡°small mail¡± is losing out to email and other types of electronic communication.First-class mail amount fell from a high point of 104 million pieces in 2000 to just 64 million pieces by 2014.

Congress permits the 600,000-employee USPS to hold a monopoly(¢¶Ï) over first-class and standard mail.The company pays no federal£¬state or local taxes£»pays no vehicle fees£»and is free from many regulations on other businesses.Despite these advantages£¬the USPS has lost 52 billion since 2007£¬and will continue losing money without major reforms.

The problem is that Congress is preventing the USPS from reducing costs as its

2 / 8

£¨È«¹úͨÓã©2017°æ¸ß¿¼Ó¢Óï¶þÂÖ¸´Ï°¿¼Ç°Èý¸öÔÂרÌâÒ»ÔĶÁÀí½âϸ×öÄ£ÄâÊÔÌ⣬ÌâÐÍ·ÖÀà

Í»ÆÆ£¨Ê®¶þ£©ÎÄÕ½ṹ֮ƪÕ½ṹÌâ sales decline£¬and is blocking efforts to end Saturday service and close unneeded post office locations.USPS also has a costly union-dominated workforce that slows the introduction of new ideas or methods down.USPS workers earn significantly higher payment than comparable private-sector workers.The answer is to privatize the USPS and open postal markets to competition.With the rise of the Internet£¬the argument that mail is a natural monopoly that needs government protection is weaker than ever.

Other countries facing declining letter amounts have made reforms.Germany and the Netherlands privatized their national postal companies over a decade ago£¬and other European countries have followed suit.Britain floated shares of the Royal Mail on its stock exchange in 2013.Some countries£¬such as Sweden and New Zealand£¬have not privatized their national postal companies£¬but they have opened them up to competition.

These reforms have driven efficiency improvements in all of these countries.Additional number of workers have been reduced£¬productivity has risen and consumers have benefited.Also£¬note that cost-cutting measures¡ªsuch as closing tone post offices¡ªare good for both the economy and the environment.

Privatization and competition also encourage new changes.When the USPS monopoly over ¡°extremely urgent¡± mail was stopped in 1979£¬we saw an explosion in efficient overnight private delivery by firms such as FedEx.

The government needs to wake up to changing technology£¬study postal reforms abroad and let businessmen reinvent our out-of-date postal system. ÓïÆª½â¶Á ±¾ÎÄΪÒéÂÛÎÄ£¬Ö÷ÒªÂÛÊöÁËÈçºÎ½â¾öUSPSÔÚ¾­ÓªÉÏÓöµ½µÄÎÊÌâ¡£ 4£®What do we know about the USPS?

A£®Its great competitor is the delivery firm FedEx. B£®It is an old public service open to competitions. C£®Its employees don¡¯t pay federal£¬state or local taxes. D£®It has complete control of first-class and standard mail. ´ð°¸ D

½âÎö ϸ½ÚÀí½âÌâ¡£¸ù¾ÝµÚ¶þ¶ÎµÚÒ»¾ä¡°Congress permits the 600,000-employee USPS to hold a monopoly(¢¶Ï) over first-class and standard mail.¡±¿ÉÖªUSPS¢¶ÏÁË¡°first-class and standard mail¡±¡£¹ÊDÕýÈ·¡£

5£®The author mentions some other countries in Paragraph 4 to . A£®explain the procedures of reform to the USPS B£®show the advantages of private postal services

3 / 8

£¨È«¹úͨÓã©2017°æ¸ß¿¼Ó¢Óï¶þÂÖ¸´Ï°¿¼Ç°Èý¸öÔÂרÌâÒ»ÔĶÁÀí½âϸ×öÄ£ÄâÊÔÌ⣬ÌâÐÍ·ÖÀà

Í»ÆÆ£¨Ê®¶þ£©ÎÄÕ½ṹ֮ƪÕ½ṹÌâ C£®set some examples for the government to learn from D£®prove the situation is very common around the world ´ð°¸ C

½âÎö д×÷ÒâͼÌâ¡£ÎÄÕµÚËĶÎдµ½ÆäËûÓöµ½ÏàͬÎÊÌâµÄ¹ú¼Ò¶¼ÊÇÈçºÎ½â¾öµÄ£¬ÒÔ´Ë¿ÉÒÔÍÆ¶Ï³öÊÇÏ£ÍûÕþ¸®¿´µ½ÕâЩÀý×Ó²¢Ð§·Â¡£¹ÊCÕýÈ·¡£

6£®The author probably agrees that the USPS . A£®needs government¡¯s protection as ever B£®can work together with other businesses C£®must be replaced by international companies D£®should be sold out and become a private service ´ð°¸ D

½âÎö ¹Ûµã̬¶ÈÌâ¡£ÎÄÕµÚËĶÎÖУ¬×÷ÕßÈÏΪ½â¾öUSPSµÄÎÊÌ⣬Õþ¸®Ó¦¸ÃÏòµÂ¹ú¡¢ºÉÀ¼µÈ¹ú¼Òѧϰ£¬ÄÇô¿ÉÍÆÀí³öÕâЩ¹ú¼ÒµÄ×ö·¨ÊÇ×÷ÕßÈϿɵģ¬ÕâЩ¹ú¼ÒµÄ×ö·¨¿É×ܽáΪÁ½ÖÖ£ºË½Óл¯ºÍÍÑÀëÕþ¸®µÄ±Ó»¤½øÈ뾺ÕùÊг¡¡£Òò´Ë´ð°¸ÊÇD¡£

7£®Which of the following shows the development of ideas in this passage?

I£ºIntroduction CP£ºCentral point P£ºPoint Sp£ºSub-point(´ÎÒªµã) C£ºConclusion ´ð°¸ B

½âÎö ƪÕ½ṹÌ⡣ȫÎÄÒ»¹²Æß¶Î£¬µÚÒ»¶ÎºÍµÚ¶þ¶ÎÊDZ³¾°ÐÅÏ¢£¬ÊôÓÚIntroduction£»µÚÈý¶ÎÊôÓÚCentral point£»µÚËÄ¡¢Îå¶ÎÊÇP1£»µÚÁù¶ÎÊÇP2£»µÚÆß¶Î½øÐÐ×ܽᣬÊôÓÚConclusion¡£¹ÊBÕýÈ·¡£

C

Fifty years ago£¬the well-loved musician Bob Dylan played at the Newport Folk

4 / 8